silver market Archives

The Most Perfect Medium

By Howard Katz – 10/11/2010

The precious metals markets moved into high gear last week with silver up 4.5% and new highs in gold and the HUI. Meanwhile the Wall Street Journal explained:

“Driving the recent spate of [currency] flows has been anticipation that the Federal Reserve will restart its efforts to stimulate growth through purchases of government debt that inject more money into the banking system – a practice known as quantitative easing or ‘QE.’”

“Easy Money Churns Emerging Markets,” by Alex Frangos,
WSJ, 10-8-10, p. A-10.

Sad, sad news in the daily paper this week.  We live in a world where the leaders of our country, and every country in the world, believe that there is nothing more to the production of wealth than to simply create, out of nothing, the money which symbolizes it.  The Journal again:

“Investors who had been betting on the dollar switched their wagers in the past few weeks as they grew convinced the Fed will pump still more money into financial markets to bolster the struggling U.S. economy – essentially diluting the value of the dollar.”

“Dollar’s Fall Roils World,” by Tom Lauricella, WSJ 10-8-10,
p. A-1.

For several years, we have watched as the precious metals markets have told us of a truly amazing advance.  Since their lows in the last century, both gold and silver have multiplied by a factor of more than 5.  Both metals have traced out powerful up trends with repeated bullish chart patterns. And now we know the answer why.  The Government of the United States, in the person of Ben Bernanke (and his fellow officials at the Federal Reserve), is trying to reduce the people of America to medieval serfs, to steal their wealth and to give it to the likes of Goldman Sachs (and a few other institutions which have obtained their great wealth not by producing it but by having the Government steal it for them).

The mechanism of this historic theft is counterfeiting.  Indeed, the government has set up the counterfeiting department (the Federal Reserve System).  It prints money and gives this new money to its favorites (who respond via bribes disguised as campaign donations and job offers).

But as we gold bugs have been arguing, the printing of money causes the depreciation of the currency, and this must cause all prices (denominated in that currency) to rise. And this is taking the form of a general increase in commodity prices, itself led by the precious metals.

adly, America was once governed by wiser men.  In 1816, Thomas Jefferson commented:

“We are now taught to believe that legerdemain tricks upon paper can produce as solid wealth as hard labor in the earth. It is vain for common sense to urge that nothing can produce but nothing; that it is an idle dream to believe in a philosopher’s stone which is to turn everything into gold, and to redeem man from the original sentence of his Maker, ‘in the sweat of his brow shall he eat his bread.’” –Thomas Jefferson to Charles Yancey, 1816. ME 14:381

Jefferson was talking about the Second Bank of the United States. He and James Madison had abolished the First Bank of the United States in 1811, but Madison backed down and allowed a second bank in 1816. This bank was later destroyed by Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren in 1836 (as a result of Jackson’s overwhelming victory in the 1832 election). It was this battle against the second bank which gave birth to the (real) Democratic Party.

If the Democratic Party was born to destroy the central bank and if the Democrats hold power today, then why is it we have a central bank which keeps on printing more and more money? Indeed, in the easing of 2008 we knew that we were being robbed for the benefit of Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street Houses which had accumulated toxic assets. But here in late 2010 we are not even allowed to know who will receive the wealth which is being taken from us.

Once Jackson had destroyed the Second Bank of the United States, the U.S. began a period of economic growth unprecedented in human history. A cornucopia of wealth flowed such as mankind had never seen. The human lifespan increased. A continent was tamed. One after the other, new machines and devices for the improvement of people’s lives poured out of the factories of the nation.

It should be noted that all this was accomplished without the hint of rising prices. From 1793 to 1933, the prices of basic wholesale goods came out the same. For most of this period, there was no word for unemployment for the simple reason that unemployment was so low that nobody noticed it, and nobody spoke of it.

As Bernanke made clear his intention to counterfeit yet another round of money (at this point no one knows how much), the dollar collapsed on the world markets. It collapsed against gold and silver.  It collapsed against the grains. And, as the above chart shows, it even collapsed against the other paper currencies.  (All of these paper currencies are going down, but the dollar is going down faster.)  Chartists will recognize the pattern which has been formed as a head and shoulders top, and the price objective point is 72.

What Jefferson was saying was that the issue of paper money could not create real wealth. Wealth is (scarce) goods which satisfy a human need. In simple language, wealth is stuff. President Obama’s and President Bush’s economic advisors do not know this. They keep saying that the printing of money will create stuff (“stimulate the economy”). One repeatedly hears the theory that the printing of money will so dramatically stimulate the economy that the extra goods thus created will cause a net decline in prices.

This theory (of a net decline in prices) is repeated throughout the financial world. Every time this forecast is made it proves false. But the people who hear the forecast have short memories. They forget that the last time they heard the same forecast it was also wrong. Ditto, ditto the time before that. They do not look at the facts. They look at the impressive credentials of the con artists who are deceiving them. And so they believe, again and again and again.

The important thing to understand about this confidence game is that it only devours its own.  To be protected against it, all you have to do is to see reality as it is.  The printing of paper money does not create wealth. Jefferson again.

“Specie is the most perfect medium because it will preserve its own level; because, having intrinsic and universal value, it can never die in our hands, and it is the surest resource of reliance in time of war.” –Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1813. ME 13:430

If you wish to be protected against the depreciation of our currency by Ben Bernanke, then specie (gold or silver) is the most perfect medium.  Any real good will provide protection. However, gold and silver have been chosen as money for certain reasons of convenience. They are the easiest to hold and to exchange with others.  They have been used as money for 2500 years, and they are the only legal monies under the United States Constitution.  As Ben Bernanke destroys the (Federal Reserve note) dollar, all real goods will rise in price, and gold and silver will lead (are leading) the way. The people who believe the establishment and plan for “deflation” will be destroyed. The people who believe Thomas Jefferson will be protected.

Thank you for your interest.

Howard S. Katz

****

To assist the good people with the technical details of speculating in gold or silver and in general dealing with the problems created by a paper currency, I publish a fortnightly (every two weeks) newsletter, the Gold Bug.  To subscribe, go to my web site, www.thegoldspeculator.com and press the Pay Pal button ($300).  Or you may send $290 to The One-handed Economist, 614 Nashua St. #122, Milford, N.H. 03055 ($10 cash discount).  Our most recent issue was dated Oct. 1, 2010.

$2,500 Gold Could Easily Result in $178.50 Silver – Here’s Why!
By Lorimer Wilson
Sep 20 2010 11:49AM
www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com

More than 95 respected economists, academics, analysts and market commentators are of the firm opinion that gold will go to $2,500 and beyond before the parabolic peak is reached. In fact, the majority (55) think a price of $5,000 or more -even as high as $15,000 – is actually more likely! As such, just imagine what is in store for silver given its historical price relationship with gold!

Precious metal bull markets have 3 distinct demand-driven stages and we are now quickly approaching or perhaps even in the very early part of the last stage which occurs when the general public around the world starts investing in gold and this deluge of capital into gold causes it to escalate dramatically (i.e. go parabolic) in price.

Gold

Gold went up 24% in 2009 and is up 16% YTD and, as such, there are no shortage of prognosticators who see gold going parabolic reminiscent of 1979 when gold rose 289.3% in the course of just over a year (from a $216.55 closing price on Jan. 1, 1979 to a closing price of $843 per ounce barely a year later on Jan. 21, 1980) and 128% higher in a late-1979 parabolic blow-off of just under 11 weeks! A 289% increase in the price of gold from $1275 would put gold at $4,960. (More on what that might mean for the future price of silver is analyzed below.) That being the case what appear on the surface to be rather outlandish projections of what the bull market in gold will top out at don’t seem quite so far-fetched. (For a complete list of the economists, academics, market analysts and financial commentators who maintain that gold will go parabolic to $2,500 -$15,000 in the near future please see:

http://www.munknee.com/2010/09/5000-gold-bandwagon-now-includes-these-55-analysts-got-gold/

Silver

Silver has proven itself, time and again, to be a safe haven for investors during times of economic uncertainty and, as such, with the current economy in difficulty the silver market has become a flight to quality investment vehicle along with gold. The 49% increase in silver in 2009 (and 23% YTD) attests to that in spades. During the last parabolic phase for silver in 1979/80 it went from a low of $5.94 on January 2nd, 1979 to a close of $49.45 in early January, 1980 which represented an increase of 732.5% in just over one year. Such a percentage increase from the current price of almost $21 would represent a future parabolic top price of $175. (For what that might mean for the future price of gold see the analysis below.) Frankly, such prices seem impossible in practical terms but that is what the numbers tell us.

Gold:Silver Ratio

The current gold:silver ratio has been range-bound between 70:1 and 60:1 for quite some time which is way out of whack with the historical relationship between the two precious metals. It begs the question: “Is now the perfect time to buy silver instead of the much more expensive gold metal?”

How both gold and silver perform, in and of themselves, does not tell the complete picture by a long shot, however. More important is the price relationship – the correlation – of one to the other over time which is called the gold:silver ratio. Based on silver’s historical correlation r-square with gold of approximately 90 – 95% silver’s daily trading action almost always mirrors, and usually amplifies, underlying moves in gold. With significant increases in the price of gold expected over the next few years even greater increases are anticipated in silver’s price movement in the months and years to come because silver is currently seriously undervalued relative to gold as the following historical relationships attest.

Let’s look at the gold:silver ratio from several different perspectives:

- Over the past 125 years the mean gold:silver ratio (i.e. 50% above and 50% below) has been 45.69 ounces of silver to 1 ounce of gold.
- In the last 25 years (since 1985) the mean gold:silver ratio has increased to 45.69:1
- The present gold:silver ratio has been range-bound between 60:1 and 70:1 (61.3:1 as of September 17/10).
- Interestingly, during the build-up to the parabolic blow-off in 1979/80 silver outpaced gold going up 732.5% vs. gold’s 289.3% causing the ratio to drop from 38:1 in January 1979 to 13.99:1 at the parabolic peak for both metals in January,1980.

Let’s now look at the various price levels for gold and the various silver:gold ratios mentioned above one by one and see what conclusions we can draw.
First let’s use the Sept. 17, 2010 price of $1276.50 for gold and apply the various gold:silver ratios mentioned above and see what they do for the potential % increase in, and price of, silver.

Gold @ $1276.50 using the current 61.3:1 gold:silver ratio puts silver at $20.82 (Sept. 17/10)
Gold @ $1276.50 using the above 45.69:1 gold:silver ratio puts silver at $27.94 (i.e. +34.2%)
Gold @ $1276.50 using the above 13.99:1 gold:silver ratio puts silver at $91.24 (i.e. +338.2%)

Now let’s apply the projected potential parabolic peaks of $2,500, $5,000 and $10,000 to the various gold:silver ratios and see what they suggest is the parabolic top for silver.

@ $2,500 Gold

Gold @ $2,500 using the gold:silver ratio of 61:1 puts silver at $41
Gold @ $2,500 using the gold:silver ratio of 45:1 puts silver at $55.50
Gold @ $2,500 using the gold:silver ratio of 14:1 puts silver at $178.50

Before we go any further the above analyses bears closer scrutiny. In paragraph four above it was noted that “During the last parabolic phase for silver in 1979/80 it went from a low of $5.94 on January 2nd, 1979 to a close of $49.45 in early January, 1980 which represented an increase of 732.5% in just over one year.” Such a percentage increase from the current price of almost $21 would represent a future parabolic top price of $175.

It is interesting to note that the above $175 is almost identical to the $178.50 that would result from a reversion to the mean in the gold:silver ratio with gold at $2,500. For the gold bugs who believe that gold is going to go even higher it can only mean a very much higher price for silver as the analyses below suggest.

@ $5,000 Gold

Gold @ $5,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 61.1 puts silver at $82
Gold @ $5,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 45:1 puts silver at $111
Gold @ $5,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 14:1 puts silver at $357

@ $10,000 Gold

Gold @ $10,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 61:1 puts silver at $164
Gold @ $10,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 45:1 puts silver at $222
Gold @ $10,000 using the gold:silver ratio of 14:1 puts silver at $714!!

From the above it seems that, any way we look at it, physical silver is currently undervalued compared to gold bullion and is in position to generate substantially greater returns than investing in gold bullion.

Summary

History will look back at the artificially high gold:silver ratio of the past century as an anomaly, caused by the dollar bubble and the world being deceived into believing that fiat currencies are real money, when in fact they are all an illusion. This fiat currency experiment will end badly in a currency crisis and when that happens, as it surely will, gold will go parabolic and silver along with it but even more so as the gold:silver ratio adjusts itself to a more historical correlation. The wealthiest people in the future will be those who put 10% to 15% (or perhaps more – much more!) of their portfolio dollars into physical silver today and were smart enough to research and pick the best silver mining/royalty stocks and warrants to maximize their returns.

Indeed, while gold’s meteoric rise still has room to run, silver’s run is yet to get started. As such, it certainly appears evident that now is the time to buy all things silver.

Please Note:

- This is a one-of-a-kind article which no doubt will get a great deal of attention and be posted on a large number of other financial sites and blogs. This is encouraged but to avoid copyright infringement the author’s name must be included with a hyperlink to the original article.

Lorimer Wilson
September 19, 2010

****

Lorimer Wilson is the Editor of both www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com (a sight/site for sore eyes and inquisitive minds) and www.munKNEE.com (a site consisting of edited excerpts of the internet’s most informative articles on money matters).  He can be reached at editor@munknee.com

Original Source:  http://www.kitco.com/ind/Wilson/sep202010.html

by Tyler Durden

The Andrew Maguire LBMA whistleblower story just refuses to go away, and it is about time someone from the mainstream media (yes, we know you read us constantly) finally picked up on this massive expose about the decades of fraud and manipulation in the commodities market, with a focus on gold and silver. Don’t worry, the Wall Street ad revenue sources you may lose from highlighting this “must read” story will be more than offset by the increased readership you will gain. Today we have the latest segment in this saga, courtesy once again of Eric King who interviews GATA members Bill Murphy, Chris Powell and Adrian Douglas.As is pointed out in the interview, “The CFTC, on the public record, has been shown to have known in advance of massive market manipulation, and have done nothing.” Isn’t this the same reason why Markopolos called SEC the biggest bunch of idiots in existence vis-a-vis their performance in the Madoff debacle? It is time someone big blew this up finally. Perhaps this will explain why it never get mainstream attention: “JPMorgan chase is an agency of the US government, rigs the markets, and undertakes market manipulation.” To all our readers: this is yet another “must hear” interview.

From King World News:

In this interview with GATA we continue the saga after just having interviewed Andrew Maguire, the whistleblower out of London. This gives a short and long-term view down the rabbit hole through the eyes of 3 of the GATA board members.  GATA was so heavily involved not only in breaking the news at the CFTC meeting about the the metals manipulation but also at the same time quite possibly uncovering the largest fraud in history. The Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee was organized in January 1999 to advocate and undertake litigation against illegal collusion to control the price and supply of gold and related financial securities. The committee arose from essays by Bill Murphy, a financial commentator, and by Chris Powell, a newspaper editor in Connecticut, published at Murphy’s Internet site, lemetropolecafe.com.  In this GATA Roundtable we will have Bill Murphy, Chris Powell and Adrian Douglas.

Link to King World News.